The Smidgin

Investigating the Intersection of Science and Religion

Time Magazine on Obama’s Speech

with one comment

Time has a very insightful article on Barack Obama’s speech on race last week, recognizing both why Obama took the route he did and why it is a very dangerous move.  From the conclusion:

By asking voters to understand the context of Wright’s anger, though, Obama is counting on voters to accept nuance in an arena that almost always rewards simplicity over complexity. Politicians tend to offer deliberately banal choices: Either we move forward or we fall backward, either we let the economy falter or we help it grow, either we succumb to our enemies or we defeat them — the choice is up to you, America! Obama’s formulation was different. Explicitly asking Americans to grapple with racial divisions and then transcend them — that’s a bolder, riskier request.

As for me, I believe Obama did exactly what he needed to do, both for the campaign and for his conscience.  The result was one of the most inspiring speeches I have ever heard.

Written by Jim

22 March 2008 at 10:26

Posted in Links

Tagged with , , ,

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Jim,

    I am not sure what Obama means any more. If he is that candidate of change then I have an idea of what he can do to heal America. If he really wants to bridge the gap between the races and extend an olive branch to the republicans then he needs to make more of an effort to make me feel like he really means it.

    Of course I have a post about this “why can’t we all just get along” idea. I would appreciate your comments on my new plan for the Republic.

    Let me know what you think of my new plan to save America at:
    http://riggword.wordpress.com/

    Thanks for your time

    Rigg

    26 March 2008 at 06:24


Leave a Reply