Twenty Years Forward, Five Miles Back

17 May

“40 MPG! That’s no typo!” proclaimed a billboard along the side of the highway as it advertised the new Honda Accord. To most people, 40 miles to the gallon probably seems quite good.  After all, we do live in a nation where the size of your vehicle often seems to define your worth. Still, is 40 MPG really that good?

Lady HarrietTo illustrate this point, consider my car. She’s a 1989 Toyota Corolla 4-door sedan affectionately named Lady Harriet (namesake).  She might not look too pretty (though I keep her nice and shiny), but she runs beautifully.

This past week I took her 900 miles across the country and she performed even better than I expected.  My gas mileage was, get this, 40.7 miles per gallon. And that’s not the best she’s ever done.  Her record was set in a rainstorm on a back country highway with stoplights somewhere in Oklahoma: 42.8 miles per gallon.

Perhaps I’m writing this post just because I want to brag about my car.  (Right, so I’m definitely writing this post because I want to brag about my car; it’s kind of like bragging about your kid.)  That aside, in the nearly 20 years from the ’89 Corolla to the ’09 Corolla we seem to have gone backward by five miles per gallon.

Of course there are lots of things that explain this: cars have gotten bigger and heavier, airconditioning and other ammenities hurt gas mileage, etc.  But in a world with gas at nearly $4.00 per gallon, maybe we should start considering what technology can do for us.  The Honda Accord I saw advertised is one of the top cars for fuel economy outside of hybrids and smartcars, and it only gets 40 MPG?

I heard a radio host recently talking about hypermiling.  He made an interesting comment: if people aren’t willing to slow down a bit to save gas or, I would add, buy fuel efficient cars, then maybe gas at $4.00 a gallon isn’t such a bad thing.  Honestly, it’s refreshing to hear someone speaking with such sound economic sense.  If we’re not willing to change our lifestyles to conserve gas money, it means gas prices are still at an acceptable market price.  Of course, there are questions of inelasticity and all that jazz, but the fact remains that as rational creatures we respond to incentives and disincentives.  The price of gas has evidently not yet reached a level to become a disincentive.  When it does we’ll see smaller cars getting significantly better than 40 MPG.  I guarantee it.

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.