<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: were kiling english</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smidg.in/2009/09/27/were-kiling-english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smidg.in/2009/09/27/were-kiling-english/</link>
	<description>The Smidgin: A Sporadic Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://smidg.in/2009/09/27/were-kiling-english/#comment-4033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smidg.in/?p=596#comment-4033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is rather annoying when people don&#039;t seem to care and seemingly just pound away at the keyboard as fast as they can. I do think people should try for legitimacy. Like you said, a few typos are fine by me, but use capitals and punctuation, huh?

By the way, nice looking WordPress theme. One gripe, though - I can&#039;t seem to check the box beside &#039;Notify me of follow-up comments by email&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is rather annoying when people don&#8217;t seem to care and seemingly just pound away at the keyboard as fast as they can. I do think people should try for legitimacy. Like you said, a few typos are fine by me, but use capitals and punctuation, huh?</p>
<p>By the way, nice looking WordPress theme. One gripe, though &#8211; I can&#8217;t seem to check the box beside &#8216;Notify me of follow-up comments by email&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thainamu</title>
		<link>http://smidg.in/2009/09/27/were-kiling-english/#comment-4028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thainamu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smidg.in/?p=596#comment-4028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My personal favorite was when a certain forum member didn&#039;t like my comment and replied, &quot;Your nuts!&quot;  I, being of the female persuasion, took exception to that comment.

I agree entirely with what you are saying.  The real point here is not to be a grammar Nazi, but that by using correct words, spelling, and punctuation one really can communicate &lt;i&gt;better&lt;/i&gt;.

One thing I may take exception to, however, is that you might have the idea that English is static, that there is only one precisely correct way to speak and write.  But that just isn&#039;t true.   Also, we really can&#039;t kill English (unless we no longer speak it to our children).  All languages change over time, even those with a rich literary history.  It may seem impossible to those of us who notice this minutia, but certain usages that are ungrammatical today, may be entirely acceptable sometime not so far into the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal favorite was when a certain forum member didn&#8217;t like my comment and replied, &#8220;Your nuts!&#8221;  I, being of the female persuasion, took exception to that comment.</p>
<p>I agree entirely with what you are saying.  The real point here is not to be a grammar Nazi, but that by using correct words, spelling, and punctuation one really can communicate <i>better</i>.</p>
<p>One thing I may take exception to, however, is that you might have the idea that English is static, that there is only one precisely correct way to speak and write.  But that just isn&#8217;t true.   Also, we really can&#8217;t kill English (unless we no longer speak it to our children).  All languages change over time, even those with a rich literary history.  It may seem impossible to those of us who notice this minutia, but certain usages that are ungrammatical today, may be entirely acceptable sometime not so far into the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

