The Smidgin

11 Jan
Fedora

Incidentally, I also have a new hat.

It has been a constant source of frustration to me that the Smidgin has difficulty running consistently on any one topic. Only recently has it occurred to me that such a cohesive publication would, in fact, be antithetical to the very title. In the prophetic tradition of living up to a given name, it would seem the smidgens on the Smidgin have been wildly successful, despite my best efforts.

Now I have some doubts as to whether there is any actual sustained readership of this blog. Nevertheless, notice should be given to the few possible readers that any attempt at thematic coordination is hereby abandoned.

Similarly, post regularity is in no way guaranteed. Yet it must be acknowledged that writing, even of a lowly blog, can be beneficial. Some attempt will thus be made at posting at least occasionally.

Life and Death in the Prehistoric Age

28 Nov

Interesting article on how mammals got really huge really fast after the dinosaurs died.

“One simple way of reading Darwin is almost anything is possible and animals can be adapted in any way. There’s a counter school of thought which says evolution is moulded by physical restrictions too, and that’s the most interesting point here.”

What I really like is how the researcher refers to mammals as “we”:

“Mammals actually evolved almost around the same time as dinosaurs, about 210 million years ago,” she told BBC News. “And for the first 140 million years, we were basically vermin scurrying around the feet of the dinosaurs and not really doing much of anything.

Easy Questions?

20 Aug

The Gospel of Mark, Chapter 3

You get the impression in the beginning of Mark that Jesus’ way is entirely foreign to the people of that time. So many questions!

The really sad part is that there are certain questions that should be so easy—”Is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do harm, to save life or to kill?” Does it even have to be the Sabbath to know the answer to that question? It’s apparent!

It makes you wonder what easy decisions we’re missing in our own lives.

Tags: , , ,

A Clockwork Origin

13 Aug

Coincidentally, Futurama yesterday (in order to celebrate my finishing The Origin) ran an episode on evolution: A Clockwork Origin.

The End of the Origin

12 Aug

It took me a long time, but I’ve finally finished Darwin’s The Origin of Species. Originally I had been intending to write a review of sorts upon completion. But, to be honest, I’m not entirely sure what I would say.

This work is astounding. You quickly realize that you are reading the thoughts of a genius; a genius who took the scattered pieces of an immense puzzle and put them together. Not only that, but he devoted his life to it. The amount of effort and time that Darwin put into studying and verifying his theory is incredible.

Rather than summarizing or extrapolating or otherwise attempting and failing to tell you about the book, I’ll simply give you the ending. If you have a minute, read through it, it’s well worth it.

I see no good reasons why the views given in this volume should shock the religious feelings of any one. It is satisfactory, as showing how transient such impressions are, to remember that the greatest discovery ever made by man, namely, the law of the attraction of gravity, was also attacked by Leibnitz, “as subversive of natural, and inferentially of revealed, religion.” A celebrated author and divine has written to me that “he has gradually learned to see that it is just as noble a conception of the Deity to believe that He created a few original forms capable of self-development into other and needful forms, as to believe that He required a fresh act of creation to supply the voids caused by the action of His laws.”

Why, it may be asked, until recently did nearly all the most eminent living naturalists and geologists disbelieve in the mutability of species? [...]

But the chief cause of our natural unwillingness to admit that one species has given birth to other and distinct species, is that we are always slow in admitting any great changes of which we do not see the steps. The difficulty is the same as that felt by so many geologists, when Lyell first insisted that long lines of inland cliffs had been formed, and great valleys excavated, by the agencies which we still see at work. The mind cannot possibly grasp the full meaning of the term of even a million years; it cannot add up and perceive the full effects of many slight variations, accumulated during an almost infinite number of generations.

Although I am fully convinced of the truth of the views given in this volume under the form of an abstract, I by no means expect to convince experienced naturalists whose minds are stocked with a multitude of facts all viewed, during a long course of years, from a point of view directly opposite to mine. It is so easy to hide our ignorance under such expressions as the “plan of creation,” “unity of design,” etc., and to think that we give an explanation when we only restate a fact. Any one whose disposition leads him to attach more weight to unexplained difficulties than to the explanation of a certain number of facts will certainly reject the theory. A few naturalists, endowed with much flexibility of mind, and who have already begun to doubt the immutability of species, may be influenced by this volume; but I look with confidence to the future, to young and rising naturalists, who will be able to view both sides of the question with impartiality. Whoever is led to believe that species are mutable will do good service by conscientiously expressing his conviction; for thus only can the load of prejudice by which this subject is overwhelmed be removed.

[...]The other and more general departments of natural history will rise greatly in interest. The terms used by naturalists, of affinity, relationship, community of type, paternity, morphology, adaptive characters, rudimentary and aborted organs, etc., will cease to be metaphorical and will have a plain signification. When we no longer look at an organic being as a savage looks at a ship, as something wholly beyond his comprehension; when we regard every production of nature as one which has had a long history; when we contemplate every complex structure and instinct as the summing up of many contrivances, each useful to the possessor, in the same way as any great mechanical invention is the summing up of the labour, the experience, the reason, and even the blunders of numerous workmen; when we thus view each organic being, how far more interesting—I speak from experience—does the study of natural history become!

[...]Authors of the highest eminence seem to be fully satisfied with the view that each species has been independently created. To my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator, that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual. When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Cambrian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled. Judging from the past, we may safely infer that not one living species will transmit its unaltered likeness to a distinct futurity. And of the species now living very few will transmit progeny of any kind to a far distant futurity; for the manner in which all organic beings are grouped, shows that the greater number of species in each genus, and all the species in many genera, have left no descendants, but have become utterly extinct. We can so far take a prophetic glance into futurity as to foretell that it will be the common and widely spread species, belonging to the larger and dominant groups within each class, which will ultimately prevail and procreate new and dominant species. As all the living forms of life are the lineal descendants of those which lived long before the Cambrian epoch, we may feel certain that the ordinary succession by generation has never once been broken, and that no cataclysm has desolated the whole world. Hence, we may look with some confidence to a secure future of great length. And as natural selection works solely by and for the good of each being, all corporeal and mental endowments will tend to progress towards perfection.

It is interesting to contemplate a tangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent upon each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us. These laws, taken in the largest sense, being Growth with reproduction; Inheritance which is almost implied by reproduction; Variability from the indirect and direct action of the conditions of life, and from use and disuse; a Ratio of Increase so high as to lead to a Struggle for Life, and as a consequence to Natural Selection, entailing Divergence of Character and the Extinction of less improved forms. Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone circling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved.

BBC Redesign Redux

14 Jul

In “web time” a few years is a long time, so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that BBC news has redesigned their website again. But they have, and I was.

They seem to have fit more whitespace in, which I think I like. But there’s still a heavy use of flash. Boo. Can an iPad user get some love?

Tags: , ,

Argument from (Ridiculous) Example

11 Feb

I’m sure that by now you’ve seen the rampant political cartoons wondering where global warming went. These are excusable, and even amusing, in that they point out the irony that global warming may cause cold temperatures.

But today the New York Times has an article on the subject: “Climate Fight is Heating Up in Deep Freeze“. While justifiable, I suppose, as “news” to report on, the arguments it presents are inane.

The idea that a large snow storm disproves global warming is argument from example at its best. It’s comparable to stating that because one large company failed capitalism has been proven wrong. All hail Marx and the socialist revolution! Continue reading 

Tags: , , , ,

How Much Life in One Cubic Foot?

19 Jan

This is really cool:

How much life could you find in one cubic foot? That’s a hunk of ecosystem small enough to fit in your lap. To answer the question, photographer David Liittschwager took a green metal frame, a 12-inch cube, to disparate environments—land and water, tropical and temperate. At each locale he set down the cube and started watching, counting, and photographing with the help of his assistant and many biologists.

From: One Cubic Foot — Photo Gallery — National Geographic Magazine.

Tags: , ,

Abolish Time Zones

17 Jan

Have you ever told someone you would call at ten o’clock, only to realize they thought you meant ten o’clock their time instead of your time? I mean, it’s all good, except you called them at two o’clock in the morning. No big deal.

I have for some time now maintained that we should abolish time zones. When I suggest this I invariably get a response as such: “That’d just be silly, James.”

But stop for a moment and consider if the entire world was all a single time zone. I assert that it would be a simpler place. Continue reading 

Tags: , ,

Birds and Alligators Share Lung Structure

17 Jan

I just finished reading Your Inner Fish by Neil Shubin and he spends a lot of time offering examples of how shared structure in animals can tell us about their ancestors. There’s a prime example of this in the news today: alligators and birds share a common lung structure. Specifically, alligators breathe in only one direction, like birds, instead of in two, like mammals. Why is this important?

The researchers believe the similarity in lung structure may explain why some animals were better able to adapt after the extinction, when oxygen levels dropped.

“We know that birds are really good at breathing in hypoxic conditions. They can fly at altitudes that would kill a mammal,” said Dr Farmer.

“Many archosaurs, such as pterosaurs, apparently were capable of sustaining vigorous exercise. Lung design may have played a key role in this capacity.

“That’s been a puzzle, why do birds have these very different lungs? But now we can date it back to the common ancestor of birds and crocodilians.

From the BBC article. (See also NewScientist.)

Tags: , , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.